Laurel Dace (Chrosomus saylori) - Hannah Lee
Laurel Dace
Chrosomus saylori
What are Laurel Dace?
Taxonomy
Categorized under the Cyprinidae family, Laurel
Dace are small fish endemic to the Tennessee River Basin. Their subfamily is
Leuciscinae.
Morphology
Laurel Dace are known to reach approximately 6.2
centimeters. They are most recognized through their distinct coloring. Both
males and females have a silvery body, painted with two continuous black
lateral stripes and a red belly. During mating season, males experience
increased pigmentation; their bellies turn intense scarlet and their stripes
become rich black. Their fins also develop a yellow and orange hue.
Apart from their color, the gender of Laurel
Dace can be identified through the shape of their fins. Males have rounded
pectoral fins and females have pectoral pointed fins.
Laurel Dace also has distinct morphological
feeding traits. Strong characteristics include a large mouth, short digestive
tract, and low number of pharyngeal teeth. These traits suggest that Laurel
Dace consume macroinvertebrates, algae, and other plant materials. Based on a
study on the closely related Clinch Dace (Chrosomus
sp. cf. saylori), it is also
assumed that Laurel Dace primarily drift feed.
![]() |
A typical Dace stream is cold, slow moving, and vulnerable because of its small size. |
Habitat
Laurel Dace are native to the Tennessee River
Basin. They commonly reside in the headwater tributaries of Walden Ridge, which
is near the eastern edge of the Cumberland Plateau. They are historically found
in seven different streams which are a part of three independent water systems:
the Soddy Creek System, Sale Creek System, and Piney River System. They are
freshwater fish, surrounded by vegetation such as mountain laurel,
rhododendron, pines, and eastern hemlock. They are normally found in cold,
clear pools or slow running bodies of water from undercut banks. The maximum
water temperature of Laurel Dace is 26°C (78.8°F). Within these bodies of
water, there are three main substrates: cobble, rubble, and boulders.
How
has their geographical distribution/population changed?
Distribution
The
most noticeable change in Laurel Dace distribution is their shrinking range.
The species is historically found in seven streams along the Tennessee River
Basin, but it is not only found in six. These seven streams can be categorized
into three different water systems. The Soddy Creek System is an independent
stream and is the most southern habitat unit. The Sale Creek System is composed
of Rock Creek, Cupp Creek and Roaring Creek. These creeks also have their own
subsections. The Piney River System, the most north Laurel Dace habitat units,
include Youngs Creek, Bumbee Creek, and Moccasin Creek.
There
is also room to believe Laurel Dace will be extirpated from other locations as
well. In 2004, only one juvenile Laurel Dace was found in Soddy Creek. Laurel
Dace have also not been successfully collected in Cupp Creek since 1996.
Population
There is no conclusive population estimates
available for Laurel Dace because of private land holdings. Private land
holdings restrict surveyors and their ability to investigate and observe
streams such as Bumbee Creek. While there has not been updated information on
the state of species survival in the Soddy Creek System and Sale Creek System,
many specialists believe the Laurel Dace are at high risk of extirpation.
Are
Laurel Dace endangered?
On August 9th, 2011, the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service listed Laurel Dace as endangered species under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973. The following year, they designated critical
habitat to Laurel Dace.
Under the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, Laurel Dace are listed
with a recovery priority number of 5. This listing means that Laurel Dace have
a high degree of threat and low recovery potential.
Why
are Laurel Dace endangered?
Inherent
Species Characteristics
There are several inherent species
characteristics that greatly limit Laurel Dace survival. Laurel Dace also
naturally have small population and geographical distribution. The species’ small
population and range make is more susceptible to loss in genetic variation due
to genetic drift. Common effects of this characteristic include inbreeding
depression and a narrow range of physical tolerance. The Laurel Dace’s
inability to quickly adapt to environmental changes makes it vulnerable and
consequently, reduces the fitness of the species.
External
Pressures and Influencers
Along with the species’ natural characteristics,
external factors also contribute to its potential extinction. The most obvious
and prevalent threat to Laurel Dace is the use of surrounding land for human
activities. The implementation of roads, residential areas, and farm land in (and
near) habitat tributaries has accelerated the introduction of siltation and
sedimentation, increase in water temperature, and curtailment of riparian
vegetation. Changes in silt and sediment structures in Laurel Dace habitats
affect the species’ reproduction, feeding, and physiology. Siltation and
sedimentation directly affects visibility, which reduces visual cues in mating
and predation. It can also clog gills, which significantly decreases species
fitness. The increase in water temperature through anthropogenic climate change
results in the decrease of dissolved oxygen, which is essential to survival.
Removing surrounding vegetation such as eastern hemlock, mountain laurel, and
pines affects light filtration, water temperature, and stream flow.
In addition to changes in the structural format
of Laurel Dace habitats, nonnative species may have contributed the
population’s decline. The introduction of nonnative species such as the Green
Sunfish, Bluegill, and Largemouth Bass has potentially affected Laurel Dace
through predation and resource competition. While there is no conclusive
evidence that these species have directly influenced the trajectory of Laurel
Dace survival, studies have observed a negative correlation between nonnative
species and Laurel Dace populations.
Another factor is the inadequacy of existing
laws and regulations. Under the Tennessee Nongame and Endangered or Threatened
Wildlife Species Conservation Act of 1974, Laurel Dace are offered some
protection. The Clean Water Act and the Tennessee Water Quality Control Act aim
to improve water quality and limit habitat degradation. Despite these laws,
sedimentation continues to be problematic. Evidence of the inadequacy of
current policies can be seen through the Tennessee Department of Environment
and Conservation’s decision to put Laurel Branch and Soddy Creek on a list of
streams affected by non-irrigated crop production sedimentation.
What are the main goals of this species’ recovery plan?
In the federal recovery plan for Laurel Dace,
efforts aim to “ensure viable populations exist in all streams where the
species is known to have occurred historically” through the conservation of
existing populations and restoration and protection of habitats. Historical
locations include Piney River System (Bumbee, Moccasin, and Youngs Creeks),
Soddy Creek System, and Sale Creek System (Cupp Creek, Laurel and Horn Branch).
Enforcing current laws, policies, and
regulations to protect water quality is also vital to the survival of Laurel Dace.
The recovery plan will also work with Tennessee conservation organization
partners to inform citizens about Laurel Dace. In these efforts, the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service will educate the public on how to make changes to benefit
the lives of endangered aquatic species. They plan on encouraging agricultural,
forestry, and construction businesses to optimize their practices for the
sustainability suitable habitats. Since there is currently no detailed life
history report on Laurel Dace, the Service looks to conduct extensive research
on a captive population. A detailed life history report would allow the Service
to better understand (their environmental stressors and threats) and support
the existing Laurel Dace.
The Laurel Dace Recovery Plan can be outlined
through eight points:
- Protect Laurel Dace habitat via land acquisition, conservation easements, or other mechanisms to reduce threats to instream and riparian habitat.
- Map suitable habitat in streams where Laurel Dace are extant or occurred historically, identify streams on Walden Ridge with suitable habitat but no known records of occurrence, and periodically conduct surveys for previously undetected populations and to determine whether populations are still extant in occupied streams.
- Develop a program to monitor trends in distribution and demographic structure of Laurel Dace populations, habitat conditions, and land use in catchments of Laurel Dace streams.
- Conduct baseline genetic analysis and establish protocol for periodic monitoring to detect trends in genetic variation and structure among populations.
- Determine life history, interspecies interactions, and tolerance to environmental stressors of the Laurel Dace, and conduct population viability analysis.
- Evaluate stream crossings as fish passage barriers or nonpoint pollutant sources and reduce impact if necessary.
- Establish protocols and plan for captive propagation to support research and reintroduction or augmentation.
- Develop informational materials and conduct outreach to encourage public participation in Laurel Dace recovery effort.
What
can we do to help Laurel Dace?
The endangerment of Laurel Dace is a highly
specialized topic. There are currently no explicit programs dedicated to Laurel
Dace (or explicit legislations). The best way to contribute is to donate to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and specify which species fund you would like to support.
Spreading awareness on endangered species such as the Laurel Dace is also important. Many endangered species are underrepresented in society; sharing information is vital to making a difference. Through the Southern Trout Magazine and Clinch Chronicle, the public is slowly being exposed to Dace populations.
References
George, Anna L., Kuhajda, Bernard R., and Neely,
David A. Recovery Plan for the Laurel Dace
(Chrosomus
saylori). Chattanooga: Tennessee Aquarium Conservation
Institute, 2016.
“Laurel Dace.” Tennessee Aquarium, www.tnaqua.org/protecting-animals/laurel-dace.
Moore, Micheal. “Here Today, Gone Tomorrow.” Clinch Chronicle: Science for the
Conservation
of the Clinch Dace, 11 February 2015,
https://clinchchronicle.wordpress.com/2015/02/11/here-today-gone-today/.
Accessed 5 March 2018.
Orth, Donald. Ontogenetic and Comparative Morphology of Clinch Dace (Chrosomus sp. cf.
saylori).
Copeia, 31 December 2013.
adjacent
areas in East Tennessee. Final Report for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Contract No. 1448-0004-95-9121. 32 pp.
Skelton,
C. E. 2001. New Dace of the Genus Phoxinus (Cyprinidae: Cypriniformes) from the
Tennessee
River Drainage, Tennessee. Copeia 2001(1):118-128.
I found it very interesting that the Laurel Dace is no longer found in one stream where it used to be found. I also liked how you pointed out that private land holdings are causing recovery efforts to not be able to count how many are left in the species. Maybe this could change if there is more awareness of the species, which is one of the ideas that you had for what we could do to help. - Anna Luehrs
ReplyDelete1.8 million dollars to take this fish from endangered just to threatened! Wow, thats an extraordinary amount of money.. hopefully smaller tasks like building awareness and gaining support of the land owner's in which the stream is on can help them. Numbers like these show the difficulty conservation biologists go through. We have to pick and choose who we save, but that sure is a hard choice! - Brooke Lochhead
ReplyDeleteIt's amazing how a small geographic range makes some species so much more susceptible to endangerment! Because the Laurel Dace has really only lost one of their seven habitats completely, and yet this has had such a large impact on their overall population. This just goes to show how important human actions are, especially when concerning animals with a small geographic range. - Ava Mattis
ReplyDeleteThe thing that I found most interesting was that they don't have conclusive estimates on the population yet they were still able to list the species as endangered. How do they know that they are endangered? I also really liked that you described there appearence so thoroughly, it was very descriptive.
ReplyDelete_Shea Menzel
It's really sad that they are thought to have been extirpated from one of their primary locations and researchers are having such a difficult time collecting them in other locations where they should be existing. Its unfortunate, there isn't a lot of known information about the population of the Laurel Dace. - Morgane McTighe
ReplyDeleteIt's pretty amazing how scientists are able to differentiate the Laurel Dace from the Clinch Dace just from extremely small morphological differences. It's sad that their protection is not made a priority by current policies, and I hope it's not because it is a small fish whose protection doesn't seem as important as say, that of the a large land mammal. Every species deserves to have equal opportunity in the fight against extinction, and the public needs to be aware of that. - Ashley Lam
ReplyDeleteI find it frustrating that the inadequacy of the existing laws and regulations is causing so many problems, such as over-sedimentation, for this fish. The fish is obviously still being harmed by these human actions, and further actions should be taken to better preserve this animal's habitat.
ReplyDelete-Alijah Maldonado
Learning about the specific water temperatures that they must live under makes me worried that global warming can lead to the extinction of the Laurel Dace. What is even more surprising is that perhaps all other human activities can lead to a much quicker extinction. In both scenarios, humans are at fault, this is saddening. - Samary Mayo
ReplyDeleteWhat was very interesting to me was that they do not know for sure the population estimates of this species. Another interesting part of this blog was how the scientists are able to distinguish between the Laurel and Clinch Dace. Overall, it is a well organized and descriptive blog. - Scott Martin
ReplyDelete